Senate Panel OKs Medical Marijuana for Veterans | Marijuana

Senate Panel OKs Medical Marijuana for Veterans


A key U.S. Senate panel voted to increase military veterans’ access to medical cannabis on Thursday.

By a bipartisan vote of 20 – 10, the Senate Appropriations Committee passed an amendment that would prevent the Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) from spending money to enforce a current policy that prohibits the department’s doctors from filling out medical marijuana recommendation forms in states where the drug is legal.

The move is “an important step in restoring complete health care options for veterans,” Scott Murphy, president of Veterans for Safe Access and Compassionate Care, told in an email. “With 22 daily veteran suicides, to include self-immolation on V.A. property, and an opiate epidemic that is effecting the veteran population in higher numbers than the civilian population, it is about time our politicians caught up with the populous views of American voters and take medical cannabis seriously.”

The measure, sponsored by Sens. Steve Daines (R-MT) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), is attached to the Fiscal Year 2017 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill, which now heads to the full Senate.

Last November, the Senate approved the 2016 version of the spending bill, with the medical cannabis language attached, but the provision was not included in the final omnibus appropriations package signed into law by President Obama in December.

The V.A. policy disallowing its doctors from recommending medical marijuana in states where it is legal actually expired on January 31 but, under the department’s procedures, the ban technically remains in effect until a new policy is enacted. Advocates expect a new policy soon, but aren’t sure what it will say.

In February 2015, a top V.A. official testified before a House committee that the department is undertaking “active discussions” about how to address the growing number of veterans who are seeking cannabis treatments.

During a brief debate prior to Thursday’s committee vote, Daines said that the current policy is a “violation of each states’ Tenth Amendment rights. It is also a violation of each veterans’ First Amendment right to talk openly with their doctor.”

Speaking in opposition, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) voiced concerns that the amendment would lead to more marijuana use. “I don’t think we have too few high veterans out there,” he said.

Last April, the House of Representatives narrowly defeated the veterans marijuana amendment by a vote of 213-210.

Advocates feel better about the chances of getting the measure approved in the House this year, for a number of reasons. Last time, one medical cannabis supporter, Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA), admitted that he misread the amendment and voted the wrong way. Another supporter, Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) said he voted no because the measure didn’t go far enough in his view. With those two votes flipped, the amendment would have passed.

Additionally, the national conversation on medical cannabis and broader legalization has continued to shift in favor of those who support reform. For example, legislators in Pennsylvania just this week approved a bill to make their state the 24th in the nation with a comprehensive medical cannabis program. Gov. Tom Wolf (D) has announced he’ll sign it into law on Sunday.

Mike Liszewski of Americans for Safe Access call Thursday’s Senate committee vote “a victory for our veterans who need access to medical cannabis to treat chronic pain, PTSD, traumatic brain injury and other conditions.”

He said advocates are “hopeful we will pick up the votes necessary in the House to overcome last year’s narrow defeat last year.”

The House is expected to consider its version of the military appropriations legislation over the next month.

In addition to the spending bill amendments, there is also standalone House legislation to change V.A. policy. The bill currently has 21 cosponsors, including seven Republicans.

The new Senate committee result is two votes stronger than when the panel approved the amendment last May by a tally of 18-12.

See below for the full roll call vote:

Cochran, Thad (MS) – NO
McConnell, Mitch (KY) – NO, by proxy
Shelby, Richard C. (AL) – NO, by proxy
Alexander, Lamar (TN) – YES
Collins, Susan M. (ME) – NO
Murkowski, Lisa (AK) – YES
Graham, Lindsey (SC) – YES by proxy
Kirk, Mark (IL) – NO
Blunt, Roy (MO) – YES
Moran, Jerry (KS) – NO
Hoeven, John (ND) – NO
Boozman, John (AR) – NO
Capito, Shelley Moore (WV) – NO
Cassidy, Bill (LA) – YES, by proxy
Lankford, James (OK) – NO
Daines, Steve (MT) – YES

Mikulski, Barbara A. (MD) – YES
Leahy, Patrick J. (VT) – YES, by proxy
Murray, Patty (WA) – YES, by proxy
Feinstein, Dianne (CA) – YES, by proxy
Durbin, Richard J. (IL) – YES, by proxy
Reed, Jack (RI) – YES, by proxy
Tester, Jon (MT) – YES
Udall, Tom (NM) – YES
Shaheen, Jeanne (NH) – YES
Merkley, Jeff (OR) – YES
Coons, Christopher A. (DE) – YES, by proxy
Schatz, Brian (HI) – YES
Baldwin, Tammy (WI) –YES, by proxy
Murphy, Christopher (CT) – YES

Final result
20 YES – 10 NO

About Author

Tom Angell covers policy and politics for Separately, he serves as chairman of the nonprofit organization Marijuana Majority, which works to ensure that elected officials and the media treat legalization as a serious, mainstream issue. Marijuana Majority led the effort to get the U.S. Conference of Mayors to pass a resolution telling the federal government to respect state marijuana laws, and orchestrated the first-ever endorsement for marijuana legalization by a U.S. Supreme Court justice (John Paul Stevens). Previously, Tom worked for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition and Students for Sensible Drug Policy. (All organizations are listed for identification purposes only.)


  1. All those naysayers had to do was to Search, Cannabis and Cancer on their computers and read.
    Quit killing people with chemo and radiation.

  2. Larry Borselli on

    I am a veteran and get all of my health care through the VA. Since joining the VA’s health care system in 2005, I learned I had hepatitis c, more than likely caused by the equipment the VA used when I joined the Navy in 1974—the biggest suspect being the air driven injection device through which we received inoculations. These devices literally disappeared overnight from military bases everywhere, A VA doctor told me that over 70% of people in the U.S. coming down with hep c were veterans from the same era that I was in the military. I was eventually given the choice of either a small service connected disability payment or an attempt to get rid of the disease. I chose the latter, as there was no currently available cure at the time. After 9 years, I was successfully cured. Other health problems I had required pain medication, and I had scrips for 240 vicodins a MONTH. I was supposed to take 8 of these a day, with the maximum amount of acetominophen recommended for someone with a healthy liver. I chose not to do that. I went on my own and got my mmj card. I told my VA doctor what I had done, and he said if it worked for me it was fine with him. But it would have been so much easier if the VA would allow the doctors who work with the patients to prescribe a medicine that works and is in no way harmful. And since I now have liver cancer, maybe I can live a little longer using marijuana.

    • Robert Petersen on

      I’ve been trying to say the same thing on Hep C-which I also have, discharged in ’73 and I remember those air guns well. Doctors say I’m nuts but if it drives the medication thru your skin how can it not also drive other bacteria/virus through as well? On the other hand I have a body full of various bits of metal and several surgeries but the Hep C wasn’t diagnosed till about 84 so who knows? Kudos on the cannabis though-the cannabis has allowed me to reduce by 60% and then stay at the same dosage of morphine for 5 years-unheard of with strictly opioid based treatment. Before Montana passed our Rx Cannabis law I was taking 6X the lethal dose of morphine four times a day, plus oxycodone for “breakthrough” pain. Big Pharma and the 12 step “treatment” industry is running scared!

      • I do not have Hep C, however, I went through bootcamp in 1990 and they were still using those air inoculators. Surprised more veterans are not coming forward

Leave A Reply