New York Judge Dismisses Challenge to Federal Marijuana Laws | Marijuana

New York Judge Dismisses Challenge to Federal Marijuana Laws


NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit challenging federal laws criminalizing marijuana as unconstitutional, saying the five plaintiffs had failed to pursue changes in the drug’s legal status by first going through the Drug Enforcement Administration.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein did not address the plaintiffs claim that marijuana has medical benefits, but said the DEA has the authority to make that decision and not the courts.

The plaintiffs included former NFL player Marvin Washington, the co-founder of a company that sells hemp-based sports products, Army veteran Jose Belen, who said the horrors of the Iraq War left him with post-traumatic stress disorder, and two young children who use marijuana to treat medical conditions.

Michael Hiller, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, said they would appeal the decision.

“Resigning the plaintiffs to the petitioning administrative process is tantamount to a death sentence for those patients who need cannabis to live,” said Hiller, who had earlier argued that the administrative process takes an average of nine years.

In a statement, Belen called the ruling disappointing, “but just the beginning.”

“We are on the right side of history, and we will take this fight to the Supreme Court if necessary,” Belen said.

Hellerstein earlier had evinced sympathy for the plaintiffs’ claims that medical marijuana had helped them, but appeared to take the government’s argument seriously that the plaintiffs should petition the DEA.

The suit originally was filed in July as a growing number of states broke with the federal government and declared marijuana to be legal. Thirty have now legalized it in some fashion, including six for recreational use.

The lawsuit challenged the listing of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, a category that includes heroin and LSD. The federal government says drugs under that classification have no accepted medical use and cannot legally be prescribed.

The plaintiffs had asked the court for a permanent injunction preventing the government from enforcing the Controlled Substances Act as it pertains to cannabis.

Marijuana got its Schedule I designation as part of the ranking or “scheduling” of drugs under the 1970 act.

Government lawyers had argued there were logical reasons to classify marijuana as a dangerous drug under federal law.

A message seeking comment from the U.S. Attorney’s office was not immediately returned.

About Author


  1. This is just the tip of the iceberg with respect to how deeply inbedded out federal government is to the pharmaceutical companies that they would ignore actual known evidence to show cannabis has medical uses and keeps the American people dug into big pharma for their fix (opioids). I don’t understand how the judge could put it back on the DEA to change their scheduling for cannabis stating “the DEA has the authority to make that decision “??? How can they make that decision when they themselves are not doctors or scientists??? And for the district attorney to make the statement they did “Government lawyers had argued there were logical reasons to classify marijuana as a dangerous drug under federal law.” Where are those findings? Site your findings Mr. District Attorney or can you??? More than likely not being they are in deep with big pharma and money talks even if its at the demise of the American people!

  2. Maybe the drug world is camoflag for a lot of political mischeif . Some areas of the government use the drug world to blame and hide certain unscrupulous activities. Fake mafia killings Tricking people into using heroin by convencing them pot a herion are the same secret police activites

Leave A Reply